Fixed scope and price
Best when the goal, deliverables, acceptance criteria and constraints are stable. We document the scope, assumptions and approval points before work starts.
How we work
Every project has different constraints, but the delivery process should never feel opaque. We agree on goals, team, working model and responsibilities before engineering begins.
Evidence you can verify
01 — Process
Each stage produces something reviewable, a shared decision and clear criteria for moving forward.
Understand the goals, users, existing systems, constraints, risks and measures of success.
Outcome: Initial scope and prioritiesTurn requirements into user flows, wireframes, prototypes and interfaces the whole team can evaluate.
Outcome: Prototype or design specificationDesign the architecture and build in short, reviewable increments with regular demonstrations.
Outcome: Testable staging releasesTest according to product risk: functional, integration, responsive, performance and relevant security checks.
Outcome: Test evidence and resolved findingsPrepare production, deployment, access, monitoring and an appropriate rollback path.
Outcome: Production system and handoverChoose maintenance, fixes, improvements and operational oversight according to business criticality.
Outcome: Maintenance plan or next roadmap02 — Engagement
Best when the goal, deliverables, acceptance criteria and constraints are stable. We document the scope, assumptions and approval points before work starts.
Best for products that must learn as they evolve, existing systems, or a backlog that needs reprioritisation. We agree a monthly allocation of team capacity, usually expressed in team days, and report time, progress and risks transparently.
The bands below help frame an initial conversation; they are not a price list or a quotation. Actual pricing depends on scope, team composition, uncertainty and delivery risk. After an initial discussion, we recommend the model and provide a proposal with explicit assumptions.
We do not disclose what individual clients paid. Instead, these anonymised planning bands show the kind of engagement each investment level may support. They are starting points; a proposal confirms the scope, capacity and price for a specific engagement.
Usually a workshop, audit, prototype, documented discovery or tightly scoped improvement—not a complete custom web application.
A focused MVP, one defined application phase, or a constrained integration or modernisation project.
A multi-workflow platform, a more complex product, or a multi-phase roadmap delivered by an ongoing product squad.
03 — Team
We shape a team around the work rather than supplying an individual into an open-ended role. A typical engagement combines delivery ownership, design, engineering and testing, with lead or senior oversight. We do not offer traditional staff augmentation or a standalone hourly rate for one developer. Our pricing reflects an accountable agency team, including project management, QA, infrastructure and continuity—not the cost of an independent contractor.
View team profiles →04 — Communication
Focused meetings are combined with written, asynchronous communication so decisions keep moving across time zones. Shared working windows and urgent channels are agreed for each engagement rather than promised as a universal schedule.
05 — Delivery standards
Code review, automated checks and testing of important user flows and integrations.
Access, secrets, dependencies and personal data handled according to the agreed scope and architecture.
Staging, CI/CD or another repeatable deployment process, with access and configuration documented.
Monitoring, backup, recovery and incident processes when hosting or maintenance is in scope.
06 — After launch
A project can end with a structured handover or continue through maintenance, managed hosting, monitoring and iterative development. Service levels, response expectations and urgent channels are defined in the applicable agreement; one SLA does not fit every system.
Explore product care →07 — Ownership
After full payment, the client owns the project-specific source code, database schema, migration files, configuration, designs and other transferable deliverables identified in the agreement, and may appoint another team to maintain them. Outsourcify retains its pre-existing materials, tools and generic or reusable components, with a perpetual, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free licence for any such component incorporated into the delivered product. Third-party software and services remain governed by their respective licences.
The agreement defines the handover package. Depending on the project, it may include project-specific repositories, database schema and migrations, an environment template, build and deployment instructions, design assets or a validated prototype, decision records, essential documentation, dependency records, data-export procedures and an access inventory. Wherever practical, production accounts remain client-controlled; if Outsourcify administers an account, administrative access and transition responsibilities are documented.
Read the agency terms →FAQ
No. If the scope is already clear, we can begin with a technical review or delivery plan. A workshop is useful when important questions remain around users, workflows or architecture.
Fixed scope suits stable deliverables and acceptance criteria. Time and materials suits evolving products, reprioritised backlogs and existing systems. We recommend a model after assessing uncertainty.
We do not provide traditional staff augmentation in which one developer works in an open-ended role by the hour. We deliver as a team, either through a fixed-scope project or a monthly product squad with an agreed allocation of team days. Time and seniority inform our internal calculations, but the client buys an agency engagement that includes delivery management, QA, infrastructure, senior oversight and continuity—not isolated developer hours.
Yes. Our team works from Bangkok in UTC+7 and combines meetings, asynchronous communication and shared documentation. Required overlap windows are agreed for the engagement.
After full payment, the client owns the project-specific source code and other transferable deliverables identified in the agreement, may modify them and may appoint another team to maintain them. Outsourcify retains pre-existing and reusable components, with a perpetual royalty-free licence for any such component incorporated into the delivered product. Third-party software follows its own licence.
The agreement records control of repositories, domains, cloud and hosting accounts, app stores, databases, backups, monitoring and material third-party subscriptions. Wherever practical, production accounts are in the client’s name or provide the client with administrative access. If Outsourcify administers an account for the client, access, data export and transition steps are defined in the operating or handover plan.
Maintenance, managed hosting, monitoring and continued development are available. SLA details and response expectations are defined according to the system’s importance and chosen support arrangement.
Yes. We normally begin with a product, UX, code, infrastructure and delivery audit so risks are visible before we propose a repair, modernisation or extension plan.
Contact us
We will help identify the sensible next step: a workshop, audit, prototype or full delivery plan.
Talk to our team